Wanted: Julian Assange

“ Captain cocksman in blonde land”. Katha Pollitt woffles
in the Guardian
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/27/rape-left-julian-assange-swedish-law-wikileaks)
She states:- “Maybe it’s true that an ordinary guy, faced with
similar accusations, would have been allowed to slip away quietly
once he left Sweden rather than become the subject of an Interpol
red notice. (Maybe not, though. The 11 Swedes on Interpol’s public
red list include people wanted for fraud and other non-spectacular
crimes. Much has been made of the fact that only one of these, an
alleged child molester, is charged with a sex crime. But the vast
majority of wanted people are privately listed, so actually there’s
no way of knowing if Assange’s case is exceptional.)” And:- “In
fact, Swedish law does distinguish among degrees of rape, with
Assange being accused on one count of the least grave kind.” So I
might ask Pollitt – was it mere molestation or did Assange rape the
two women? The fellow did not call the woman the next day after he
had consensual sex with her; his condom broke or he had unprotected
sex with her – which was it?; and – a harassment charge – not a
direct unequivocal rape charge – well was she raped or wasn’t she?
– not even the woman is sure; then four days later when the second
lover calls the first, then Ardin cries – rape ( guess it took her
a while to figure out if the sex was desired consensual sex or
not). And to make matters worse he participated in two brief
affairs – absolutely criminal assault with a friendly weapon. But,
more seriously Pollitt fails to touch any of the big issues – such
as when Assange sought to rely on the benefits of the Swedish media
laws – the CIA threatened to stop sharing secrets with SEPO ( i.e.
the Swedish Secret Service). Ab initio the CIA did have a direct
interest. But, the issues don’t simply end there, for there are
still bigger issues at stake. Ever thought that Afghanistan’s
pipeline, the revelations of Wikileaks, and the US cosseting of
President Islam Karimov might simply all be intertwined. Is the US
setting out to reach Assange via Swedish proceedings, while being
fully aware of military documents accessed by Wikileaks that expose
the consistent blind eye turned by the US in its dealings (
non-dealings or intervention) with the torture, forced labour,
organised crime and one man and family rule by Karimov in
Uzbekistan? What would be the implications for the US if it acted
in a principled way about the extensive abuses in Uzbekistan? Well,
seems to me it would immediately place in danger a key supply route
into Afghanistan. Incidentally Sweden had sent troops to
Afghanistan. Silence please. The sad truth is that it is we the
people who are the voters and those in high office are – or ought
to be our honest representatives. The leaks so far have been no
more than the impressions of the employed diplomats who are hired
to give such honest opinions as they form them about the country
and individuals in the countries they have been assigned to. How
horrendously dangerous for the US Empire when the people start
reading the truth. The more we know about any dirty dealings in the
name of the people, the more the people are empowered to stop the
elected tails from wagging the electoral dog – so press on
Wikileaks. Who takes Anna Ardin seriously? Did she conspire with
her friend /lover ( ?) Sofia Wilen to set Assange balls a rolling –
that is the question. Ardin is the Political Secretary of the
Swedish Social Democrats. Ardin was connected to the “ladies in
white” who protest the Castro regime and has ties to anti-Castro
groups ( supported by the CIA) and she was deported from Cuba for
reason of subversive activities. Lieutenant Colonel Mattias Ardin,
Deputy Head of Operations, Swedish Joint Forces Land Component
Command, cousin and close friend. He works with Nato Operations in
Afghanistan. Is there any remote probability of a CIA link or
operation? Would the CIA be smart enough to get a feminist leftist
to smear Assange …duh…huh? Her blog is called “ 7 steps to legal
revenge” and step one was to screw Assange. For goodness sake she
brought the man to Sweden for a conference and a fuck. Then he
bestows blessings on her friend Sophia as well and she too sets out
to fuck him. Isn’t the whole affair a load of “poppycock” – sorry –
double “poppycock” intended to smear Assange upon the flimsiest of
so-called evidence? At least he has so far not been charged with
impotence. Top secret – I just figured it out – Assange has a
weakness for women. So, my legal advice to him is that the next
feminist Swedish woman he has sex with he proceeds as follows:- A.
Ask her in a calm voice if she desires to have sex with him, and
ensure that the hidden recording machine is running. B. Next, ask
her to write down the words of consent that she just verbally
agreed to and include in the consent document, the following:- i)
Names of the persons about to have sex. ii) Protected or
unprotected sex has to be agreed. iii) The various positions in
which the sex is permitted. iv) The duration of the sex – with a
pre-ejaculation clause included. v) Whether the Kama Sutra can at
any stage of the intercourse be consulted if the sex is not proving
exciting enough. vi) Finally – what are the expressions of sexual
satisfaction to be when the two climax – be it a simple ohhhhh – or
an – ahhhh – or some other pre-approved expression of appreciation.
C. Never forget to have the consenting Swedish woman sign with the
words added “ I have signed this document of my own volition,
without inducement, excitement, anticipation, or any other form of
seductive invitation from the man with whom I am about to have
sexual intercourse – and – I have signed because indeed I freely
want to have sex with this man (insert the man’s name).” Then you
can have sex and he can then insert his penis into the vagina ( but
only for the duration that she has pre-signed to). I plan to write
a play about the whole affair – and it will be called “ Captain
cocksman in blonde land”. http://www.globaljusticeonline.com